Doubling Renewable Energy Worldwide Could Save $740 Billion per Year

When combining all of the world’s countries, 18 percent of the world’s electricity consumption comes from renewable sources. A global agency estimates that amount could be doubled in a little more than 15 years while saving a combined $740 billion per year in the process.

The latest study, REmap 2030, from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) estimates that amping up renewables to constitute 36 percent of the international energy mix would more than offset the costs associated with fossil fuel pollution. It would also reduce the global demand for oil and gas by about 15 percent, and for coal by 26 percent.

Some of the graphics within REmap include annual investment needs and percentage breakdowns in doubling renewables’ share of the world’s TFEC—total final energy consumption—by 2030.

To IRENA, the question isn’t if it can be done, but how investment dollars should be spent to ensure that renewable energy doubling happens.

“The central policy question is this: What energy sources do we want to invest in? Our data shows that renewable energy can help avert catastrophic climate change and save the world money, if all costs are considered,” Adnan Z. Amin, director-general of IRENA, said at the report’s unveiling in New York. “In answering this question, REmap 2030 makes a clear case for renewables. It shows the transition is affordable based on existing technologies, and that the benefits go well beyond the positive climate impact.

“Countries today face a clear choice for a sustainable energy future.”

EcoWatch

EcoWatch is a cutting edge news service promoting the work of more than 1,000 grassroots environmental organizations, activists and community leaders worldwide. The site is honed in on the issues of water, air, food, energy and biodiversity, and promotes ongoing environmental campaigns including climate change, fracking, mountaintop removal, factory farming, sustainable agriculture and renewable energy.

    • nastyolbstrd

      Before any of this is a reality there is going to have to be a discussion about “How Much Is Enough?” PV solar is only about 12-15% efficient, wind is unreliable in most areas where it can be used. EV cars need batteries that can allow 300-400 miles of range and be recharged in under an hour. I’ve built several EV’s none of the current battery offerings are remotely capable of providing even 30-40 miles of range. The EV offerings touting 200-300 miles range cost approaching $150,000. Hydrogen is a solution that would require a complete decentralization of the Production and delivery infrastructure. 50-100 years from now maybe. Once the energy companies figure out how to maximize their profits from it.

    • Bob Zielazinski

      These estimates may actually be conservative. I read recently that it would cost the planet $44 trillion to get off fossil fuels entirely by 2050 – but that by doing so, we would save over $44 Trillion – by 2050…… so we are looking at somewhere around a $ Trillion/year. Just in fuel savings. My guess is that the health cost savings would certainly be noticeable.