How Offshore Wind Can Power The East Coast

Here’s something we didn’t know about offshore wind: Unlike land-based wind, which tends to blow strongest at night and in the early morning hours — when energy demand is low — offshore wind usually peaks during the day, when demand is highest.

Just one more reason, argue Stanford University scientists in a new paper [PDF], to get to work on reaping the vast bounty of power off the East Coast of the United States.

east coast wind potential stanford

image via Shutterstock

And we do mean vast.

The Stanford team determined that after taking into account typical transmission losses and inefficiencies common to offshore turbine arrays, “the U.S. East Coast offshore winds were found to produce from 965 to 1,372 terawatt hours of electricity annually, enough to satisfy the demands of one-third of the United States, or all of the East Coast, from Florida to Maine,” according to a Stanford release.

The bulk of the East Coast wind resource is found from Virginia north – a good thing, since that portion of the coast is far less likely to face devastating hurricanes. The researchers say that turbines can withstand category 3 hurricanes, and nothing beyond that strength hit the Virginia-to-Maine zone from 1851 to 2006.

So how many turbines would it take to power the East Coast? Oh, just 140,000 5-megawatt turbines, the researchers say.

Considering how daunting it has been to get a single U.S. offshore wind array built – the Cape Wind project has been muddling along for more than a decade, and construction still hasn’t begun – this at first blush sounds stupidly unrealistic.

However: Unlike with Cape Wind, under the Stanford scenario most of the turbines would be out of sight. “The analysis assumed the use of only one-third of available shallow water locations out to 30 meters depth of water, and two-thirds of remaining sites out to 200 meters depth,” according to the university.

That actually might be feasible, given the strides being made toward developing floating turbines that could be placed in waters more than 50 meters deep.

Whether this scenario ever comes anywhere near close to panning out, it does highlight the advantages of offshore wind over land-based wind (even if development costs are two or three times as high). In addition to the wind blowing when we need the energy, this resource also happens to be very close to major population centers.

“This study enables the planning and development of very large wind farms offshore of New York City or Boston. Connecting the power to the grid would be technically as easy as laying a cable in the sand and hooking it directly into the grid without the need to build often controversial transmission lines on the land,” said team member Mike Dvorak.


  • Reply September 15, 2012

    Kay Ebeling

    “In North Dakota every farmer in the state wants a wind farm on their property. An acre is $800 for a corn field, $3800 an acre if they add a wind farm.”
    Read a fast transcript of Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s interview with Stefanie Spear, from Ring of Fire today, at Aging Hippie Blog now.
    “Wind is an American resource. In this country we have better wind than any other nation in the world. North Dakota has one of the windiest places in the world. There is enough wind in Texas to power the entire U.S. grid. Wind is cheaper than coal and oil, far cheaper than nuke, and wind energy can be American made. It’s something that both republicans and democrats should want.”

  • Reply September 15, 2012

    Kay Ebeling

    Better link
    http://cityofangels25.blogspot .com/2012/09/wind-power-bobby-kennedy-jr-segment-on.html for transcript of Ring of Fire segment today

  • Reply September 16, 2012


    The paper does a great job of indicating where and when the wind blows. Certainly the only big open spaces for east coast wind power are offshore. The problem remains that wind energy is very diffuse and the technical problem is concentating it for our use. Like mining gold from seawater it can be done but its damn expensive and makes little sense. The hurdle that will need to be overcome to use this info is how to do this economically. Land based wind is already far too expensive. Current design offshore is even higher. To tap the resource discussed here requires new technology that does not exist (floating windmills for open seas) and long under sea transmission lines.

    • Reply September 16, 2012

      Pete Danko

      Good points, although I don’t think I would say that “land based wind is already far too expensive.” LCOEs between $33 and $65/MWh are not bad.

  • Reply October 19, 2012


    Add Solar to the Building Codes of new buildings, and on the roof tops of all Government buildings, and allow the Black box works of TED at to every home, we wouldn’t have an energy problem. It would eliminate the raping, stealing and pollution of our land as well.

Leave a Reply