Feds Put $1 Billion Into Carbon Capture

There’s a split in the environmental community on carbon-capture technologies, but that’s not stopping the Obama administration from plunging forward with support: The Department of Energy has formally committed a cool billion to the controversial FutureGen 2.0 demonstration project in Illinois.

Chief beneficiary of the funding is Ameren, which is working with a host of other power companies in the FutureGen Industrial Alliance to turn a coal-fired power plant into a clean-burning energy producer using oxy-combustion technology. That’s a process by which the fuel is burned in pure oxygen rather than air, theoretically yielding a carbon-dioxide rich gas that could be captured and stored.

image via FutureGen Industrial Alliance

As great as the idea of clean coal sounds, many environmentalists aren’t buying it. On the progressive website AlterNet, Jeff Biggers, whose “Reckoning at Eagle Creek: The Secret Legacy of Coal in the Heartland” won an American Book Award, called FutureGen 2.0 “an infeasible, prohibitively expensive, accident and leak-prone and chimerical scheme of oxy-combustion technology that will sorta kinda maybe capture, compress, pump and dump CO2 into Illinois’ aquifers and porous caverns.”

But while FutureGen has critics in the environmental community, it also has its supporters — the National Resources Defense Council, for example, backs the project. For his part, Energy Department Secretary Steve Chu used the FutureGen funding announcement to say that “developing innovative, cost effective carbon capture and storage technologies is critical to the country’s transition to a clean energy future.”

Like what you are reading? Follow us on RSS, Twitter and Facebook to learn more and join the green technology discussion. Have a story idea or correction for this story you are reading? Drop us a line through our contact form.

Pete Danko is a writer and editor based in Portland, Oregon. His work has appeared in Breaking Energy, National Geographic's Energy Blog, The New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle and elsewhere.


  • Reply October 6, 2010


    aren’t we trying to get away from burning fossil fuels for energy? this is the 21st century, we’re trying to move forward with clean energy, not back to the 19th century, where they burned coal. the coal deposits will only last so long, and what about the transportation and storage of the coal? can they guarantee that there won’t be any coal dust escaping into the air? i think there are better things they can spend a billion dollars on.

  • Reply October 9, 2010


    The whole idea of the project is to capture carbon from the air and liquefy it before pumping it underground into stable reservoirs that have been drained of oil/gas to remove as much CO2 from the atmosphere as possible. Just one way to mitigate the emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

Leave a Reply