Wind Power Bigs Promise To Be Nice To Birds

The wind power industry’s heavyweights are expressing their commitment to following controversial new siting guidelines laid down by the Obama administration – and pushing, again, for passage of a key federal tax incentive.

In a letter released by the American Wind Energy Assoication (AWEA), 40 major wind players – Iberdrola Renewables, NextEra Energy, Pattern Enrgy, enXco and BP Wind Energy among them – told U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar they “would support the use of the Guidelines and AWEA commits to training its members on the Guidelines and urging adherence to them.”

wind power and birds

image via Shutterstock

The warm sentiment comes as no surprise; when the administration announced the final rules on March 23 after years of drafts, discussions and consultations, AWEA CEO Denise Bode enthused that the guidelines “set the highest standard, either voluntary or mandatory, of wildlife protection for any industry.”

Reaction to the guidelines in the conservation community, however, has been mixed. Audubon came out strongly in favor; the Sierra Club was lukewarm, preferring mandatory regulations but willing to give the less stringent regimen a go; and the American Bird Conservancy was vehemently opposed, saying that the voluntary guidelines “will result in more lawsuits, more bird deaths, and more government subsidies for bad projects, instead of what America needs: true green and bird-safe wind energy.”

For the industry, the bird issue – popping up in California, Minnesota, Oregon and elsewhere – is just one of a number of thorns in its side these days. Big Wind is also running into charges that the massive turbines, which altogether now generate more than 3 percent of the nation’s electricity, are doing harm to humans. In Massachusetts, for instance, the state recently found a turbine in violation of noise standards and the turbine has been shut down pending further investigation. (It should be noted, however, that in January, a state-convened panel of independent medical and environmental health experts found little or no evidence to back up claims that low-frequency sounds from turbines harm the vestibular system, or that turbine noise brings psychological distress or mental health problems, and or that there is an association between turbine exposure and pain and stiffness, diabetes, high blood pressure, tinnitus, hearing impairment, cardiovascular disease and headache or migraine.)

Pete Danko is a writer and editor based in Portland, Oregon. His work has appeared in Breaking Energy, National Geographic's Energy Blog, The New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle and elsewhere.

  • Indeed a very smartly written post! Good read,