Is Michigan’s Constitution The Right Place For Energy Policy?

Editor’s Note: EarthTechling is proud to repost this article courtesy of Midwest Energy News. Author credit goes to Dan Ferber

Is it a good idea to incorporate a renewable energy mandate into a state’s constitution? It’s a hotly contested question in Michigan, where voters will soon decide on a ballot initiative called Proposal 3 that would make the state the first to do so.

Opponents, led by a group that has received millions of dollars from the state’s two large investor-owned utilities, say it’s inappropriate to use the state constitution to make energy policy, and that, if passed, the amendment could lock the state into wind power for decades, limiting Michigan’s future energy options in a rapidly changing industry.

Wind Power

image via Shutterstock

But environmentalists, some unions, and wind energy advocates say it’s the best way to circumvent the power of utility special interests and achieve the renewable energy Michiganders want. The amendment, they argue, actually offers more long-term flexibility than other legislative options.

Twenty-six states have passed renewable energy mandates, but in each case a bill moved through the state’s legislature and was signed by a governor. Michigan’s Proposal 3, in contrast, would amend the state’s constitution to require that 25 percent of the electricity in the state by generated from wind, solar, biomass and hydroelectric sources by 2025.

The online environmental magazine Grist called the measure, which is known informally as 25 by ’25, “the most important clean-energy vote this year.” And proponents and opponents of the measure have spent millions on television ads accusing each other having shadowy benefactors and making dishonest claims.

“We are the only clean-energy ballot proposal going on in the country this election cycle. Anybody working nationally in renewable energy is putting money in,” says James Clift, policy director for the Michigan Environmental Council

Giving the public a say

Michigan’s legislature passed the state’s first renewable energy standard in 2008, at a time when there was broader political momentum nationwide to address climate change. The law had a modest goal of achieving 10 percent of the state’s generation from renewable sources by 2015. By all accounts, the state is on track to meet that goal.

In late 2011 environmental groups huddled and decided that Michigan, with its abundant renewable resources, strong manufacturing base and history of broad support for renewable energy, was their best state to advance renewable energy further during the 2012 election cycle, said Sam Gomberg, an energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) in Chicago.

To make that happen, they formed a coalition of state and national green groups, labor unions, businesses and wind energy advocates called Michigan Energy, Michigan Jobs (the coalition includes Fresh Energy and several other members of RE-AMP, which also publishes Midwest Energy News).

“We know nothing is going to happen in D.C. for some time. We saw that Michigan could really benefit and there was strong [local] support. So we saw Michigan as one of the key states where everything was aligned and we could move the country forward,” Gomberg said.

The next question was how. They could try to move a bill through Michigan’s legislature, but legislative leaders had made it clear they were not willing to revisit the renewable energy standards until 2015, Gomberg said. So the group decided to take the question directly to voters.

Why an amendment?

Michigan is one of 21 states that allow citizen-led ballot initiatives to change state law, and also one of 18 states that allow ballot initiatives to amend the state’s constitution.

The coalition considered a ballot initiative to change state law. In most of the states where ballot initiatives are allowed, a citizen-led initiative becomes law when citizens gather enough signatures on a petition, then approve the initiative on Election Day.

But Michigan is one of two states that do it differently, Gomberg explained. Once citizens gather enough signatures, the measure then goes to the state legislature. The legislature then has 40 days to act on it. If they don’t, it goes on the ballot. But the legislature has an option to craft a competing ballot initiative, in which case both the citizen initiative and the legislature’s initiative go on the ballot.

“So, you can almost envision special interests and utilities in the back room, wringing their hands and getting excited about drafting the legislation to go head-to-head with our legislation,” Gomberg said. And the competing legislation might promote non-renewable electricity generation like natural gas, so-called “clean coal,” or nuclear power.

“Strategically, we did not see that as our best option,” he said.

So a constitutional amendment it was.

Gomberg says that amending the state constitution is absolutely an appropriate way to promote renewable energy. It’s important to note that “state constitutions are not like the federal constitution,” said Gomberg, who is also a licensed attorney. “They’re designed to be amended and changed as things evolved.”

Indeed, Michigan’s constitution, which was written in 1963, has been amended 30 times by popular vote to do things like allow casinos or limit the state’s taxing powers, Gomberg said.

“Conservatives are yelling and hollering that the constitution is not the place for renewable energy standards, but they have used it very successfully to limit the ability to tax,” he said.

Midwest Energy News, launched in 2010, is a nonprofit news site dedicated to keeping stakeholders, policymakers, and citizens informed of the important changes taking place as the Midwest shifts from fossil fuels to a clean energy system.

    • As a professional working in the energy industry, I must say proposal 3 is not what is best for Michigan right now. I believe in the future it could be a really great idea, but right now, we are putting the cart before the horse. Energy efficiency is a much more cost effective way to reduce consumption of non renewables. Also, Michigan has not yet implemented a widespread smart grid. For renewables to be successfully implemented into the grid, smart technology is crucial! Again, after Michigan reduces its consumption and rolls out the smart grid, then a renewable energy mandate makes sense. Thanks for listening.

    • Seems like an inappropriate place for such actions. I wonder if they miss what would happen, reduce total production to meet the goal?