New Rating System Could Put Energy Star On Notice

The average American home spends about 20 percent of its total energy consumption powering appliances and electronics. These devices are constantly plugged into the wall, which means that they’re using small amounts of energy even when they’re not turned on or in use. With the advent of huge, flat screen models, televisions are some of the worst offenders. In fact, some of the largest, high resolution, direct view TVs (versus rear projection products) can use as much electricity as a standard, new refrigerator — roughly 500 kilowatt-hours (kWh) — every year.

Of all the appliances we might remember to unplug when it’s not in use, the television probably isn’t one. It’s just too hard to navigate that tangle of cords behind the entertainment center every time we want to watch our favorite program. Instead, we just try to purchase a TV that’s more efficient both in and out of service. The government’s Energy Star labeling system has become the most popular way for consumers to choose a television that consumes the least amount of energy, whether active or switched off. But as we’ve seen recently, even Energy Star standards can be misleading or recalled. That’s why we were interested to learn that there will soon be a new electronics rating system on the block.


Image via Shutterstock

EPEAT (Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool) is a global registry for greener electronics. Its website,, is an easy-to-use resource for purchasers, manufacturers, resellers and others wanting to find environmentally preferable products. As a 501(c)(4) “social benefit” nonprofit organization that’s been around since 2001, EPEAT has worked closely with all stakeholders in the electronics industry, from manufacturers to purchasers, to develop an electronics environmental assessment tool through the consensus process.

The organization started out by drafting a “Voluntary Environmental Performance Criteria for Computers, Laptops and Monitors.” Then, in 2005, the Green Electronics Council (GEC) won a competitive selection process to implement and manage the EPEAT system and received a grant from the U.S. EPA to fund that process. Fast-forward a few years, and 48 participating manufacturers currently register over 2800 ‘greener’ PC and display products with EPEAT across 42 covered countries. Nearly 500 million EPEAT registered products have been purchased since the system began in July 2006, and purchase contracts requiring EPEAT exceed $65 billion.

Now, EPEAT is looking to expand its rating system to include power-hungry televisions. After three long years of drafts and discussions with stakeholders, the organization recently announced final drafts of IEEE 1680 standards that will form the basis of EPEAT Imaging Equipment and Television environmental ratings.

Now, you’re probably wondering, “Why? Don’t Energy Star ratings provide all the energy-saving criteria we need when shopping for electronics?” Good question. The truth is, there are very significant differences between EPEAT standards and the criteria through which products are evaluated for the Energy Star label. Although EPEAT doesn’t currently provide evaluations for as many products as Energy Star, there are some compelling arguments about why it might give the government label a run for it’s money.

1 Comment

  • Reply June 18, 2012


    If you do a little research, you’ll find that new flat screen TVs qualify to the current ENERGY STAR label DO NOT use as much energy as a refrigerator. In fact, the current ENERGY STAR spec limits on-mode consumption to 81 watts for a 42″ TV and 108 W for a 60″ or larger TV. And the new version (6) in development tightens things up even further. And when you take into account that California already has a mandatory state standard and the FEDs are working on a mandatory national TV standard which should include energy consumption labeling, do consumers really need another rating system?  Let’s focus on set-top boxes – they’re the real energy hogs in the house.

Leave a Reply